See what you'll receive
Sample deliverables
Each paid assessment produces a structured report. These are complete examples of those reports, built on invented subjects so you can judge the format, the depth and the vocabulary before you buy.
$29
Snapshot
Full one-time assessment for a single primary estate.
Sample report. Every organization, domain, profile and finding below is invented for illustration; all domains use the reserved .example suffix and refer to nobody. No real assessment is reproduced here.
Executive summary
- Subject
- Vellora Studio
- Report reference
- SNP-4471-A
- Primary estate
- vellora-studio.example
- Domains examined
- 12
A focused assessment of one primary estate: what was found, how confident we are, and what to do first.
Exposure
61
Exposure score out of 100
- Critical
- 1
- High
- 2
- Medium
- 2
- Low
- 0
Findings
Every finding carries its own evidence, a category from the twelve coverage domains, a severity, a confidence level and one recommended next action.
| Ref. | Observed asset | Coverage domain | Severity | Confidence | Retained evidence | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-01 | vellora-studlo.example | Typo-squatting | High | Confirmed | WHOIS record, 2 page captures, MX record | Report to the registrar |
| F-02 | secure-vellora-studio.example/login | Phishing infrastructure | Critical | Confirmed | Page capture, TLS certificate, form target | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-03 | @vellora_studio_official | Digital impersonation | High | Probable | Profile capture, 3 reused images | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-04 | vellorastudio.example | Lookalike domains | Medium | Confirmed | WHOIS record, redirect chain | Add to watchlist |
| F-05 | vellora-studio.example (SPF) | Suspicious digital assets & exposure | Medium | Confirmed | DNS record set | Harden mail configuration |
Sections in this report
01
Executive summary
02
Findings
03
Scope and limitations
What is delivered
- Format
- A structured report across three sections, with retained evidence per finding.
- Scope
- One primary estate. All twelve coverage domains examined in a single pass.
- Depth
- Findings you can act on immediately, prioritized by severity and confidence.
- Limitations
- A point-in-time assessment, not continuous surveillance. It reports what was observable at the time of collection and states explicitly what did not run. It is not a legal determination.
$249
Snapshot Extended
Extended assessment including executives and sales channels.
Sample report. Every organization, domain, profile and finding below is invented for illustration; all domains use the reserved .example suffix and refer to nobody. No real assessment is reproduced here.
Executive summary
- Subject
- Northwind Botanics
- Report reference
- SNX-2208-C
- Primary estate
- northwind-botanics.example
- Domains examined
- 12
A deeper investigation of the same estate, extended to named executives, commercial listings and a wider permutation set.
Exposure
74
Exposure score out of 100
- Critical
- 2
- High
- 3
- Medium
- 3
- Low
- 0
Findings
Every finding carries its own evidence, a category from the twelve coverage domains, a severity, a confidence level and one recommended next action.
| Ref. | Observed asset | Coverage domain | Severity | Confidence | Retained evidence | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-01 | northwind-botanics-support.example | Phishing infrastructure | Critical | Confirmed | Page capture, TLS certificate, credential form, hosting record | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-02 | "R. Aldington, Managing Director" | Executive impersonation | Critical | Probable | Profile capture, reused portrait, 2 outbound messages reported | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-03 | northwind-botanicals.example | Lookalike domains | High | Confirmed | WHOIS record, page capture, MX record | Report to the registrar |
| F-04 | storefront/nw-botanics-outlet | Counterfeit & unauthorized commercial signals | High | Confirmed | Listing capture, 6 product images, seller record | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-05 | northwindbotanics.example | Domain abuse | Medium | Confirmed | WHOIS record, parking page capture | Add to watchlist |
| F-06 | @northwind_botanics_uk | Fake profiles | Medium | Probable | Profile capture, 4 reused images, biography match | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-07 | @northwind-deals-uk (+2 accounts) | Malicious social accounts | Medium | Possible | 3 profile captures, posting-time correlation | Add to watchlist |
| F-08 | northwind-botanics.example (DMARC p=none) | Suspicious digital assets & exposure | High | Confirmed | DNS record set | Harden mail configuration |
Sections in this report
01
Executive summary
02
Asset and exposure inventory
03
Findings
04
Evidence register
05
Remediation plan
What is delivered
- Format
- A structured report across five sections, including an asset inventory, an evidence register and a sequenced remediation plan.
- Scope
- One estate plus named executives, counterfeit and sales channels, and an extended domain permutation set.
- Depth
- Prioritized findings with an evidence table and a remediation plan ordered by what reduces exposure fastest.
- Limitations
- A point-in-time assessment, not continuous surveillance. Wider coverage than Snapshot does not mean exhaustive coverage. It is not a legal determination.
$590
Enterprise Assessment
Multi-asset, multi-team assessment with integration scoping.
Sample report. Every organization, domain, profile and finding below is invented for illustration; all domains use the reserved .example suffix and refer to nobody. No real assessment is reproduced here.
Executive summary
- Subject
- Aurelin Group
- Report reference
- ENT-1039-B
- Primary estate
- aurelin-group.example
- Domains examined
- 12
A group-level assessment across several entities, organized for whoever has to decide across them.
Exposure
82
Exposure score out of 100
- Critical
- 3
- High
- 2
- Medium
- 1
- Low
- 0
Entities assessed
Entities are assessed separately and compared, so exposure can be read per company rather than as a single group total.
| Entity | Assets | Findings | Highest severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurelin Group (holding) | 9 | 5 | High |
| Aurelin Financial Services | 14 | 11 | Critical |
| Aurelin Retail | 11 | 8 | Critical |
| Aurelin Labs | 6 | 3 | Medium |
Findings
Every finding carries its own evidence, a category from the twelve coverage domains, a severity, a confidence level and one recommended next action.
| Ref. | Observed asset | Coverage domain | Severity | Confidence | Retained evidence | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-01 | aurelin-financial.example/verify | Phishing infrastructure | Critical | Confirmed | Page capture, TLS certificate, credential form, 2 hosting records | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-02 | "Aurelin Group Treasury" | Fraudulent websites | Critical | Confirmed | Page capture, payment endpoint, registrant record | Preserve evidence for counsel |
| F-03 | "M. Serrano, Group CFO" | Executive impersonation | Critical | Probable | Profile capture, reused portrait, contact attempts reported | Brief the named individual |
| F-04 | aurelin-retail-outlet.example | Counterfeit & unauthorized commercial signals | High | Confirmed | Storefront capture, 12 product images, seller record | Prepare a takedown request |
| F-05 | aurelingroup.example (+7 variants) | Typo-squatting | High | Confirmed | 8 WHOIS records, 4 page captures | Report to the registrar |
| F-06 | aurelin-labs.example (SPF, DMARC) | Suspicious digital assets & exposure | Medium | Confirmed | DNS record set, 2 sending sources | Harden mail configuration |
Sections in this report
01
Executive summary
02
Entities assessed
03
Risk matrix
04
Findings
05
Remediation plan
06
Governance and escalation
What is delivered
- Format
- A structured report across six sections, including a multi-entity view, a risk matrix, a remediation roadmap and an evidence appendix.
- Scope
- Multiple entities and asset portfolios, with roles, access perimeters and escalation routing scoped during onboarding.
- Depth
- Critical findings prioritized across entities, a sequenced roadmap, and governance and escalation recommendations.
- Limitations
- A point-in-time assessment, not continuous surveillance, and not exhaustive coverage. Recommendations are operational, not legal advice, and no finding is a determination of infringement.
$149 · 30-day cycle
Monitoring
Continuous surveillance with alerting and incident history.
Sample report. Every organization, domain, profile and finding below is invented for illustration; all domains use the reserved .example suffix and refer to nobody. No real assessment is reproduced here.
Cycle overview
A Snapshot answers what is out there at one moment. Monitoring answers what changed over 30 days — including what was resolved, because a quiet period is a result too.
- Subject
- Calder & Voss
- Report reference
- MON-7714-D
- Primary estate
- calder-voss.example
- 30-day cycle
- 30
One 30-day cycle of surveillance: what was newly observed, what escalated, what stayed the same and what was resolved.
30-day activity
- 18
- Assets watched
- 30
- Collection runs
- 4
- Alerts
- Escalated
- 1
- New
- 2
- Unchanged
- 1
- Resolved
- 2
Changes this cycle
Every finding carries its own evidence, a category from the twelve coverage domains, a severity, a confidence level and one recommended next action.
| Ref. | Observed asset | Coverage domain | Change | Severity | First seen | Retained evidence | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-01 | calder-voss-invoices.example | Phishing infrastructure | New | Critical | Day 6 | Page capture, TLS certificate, credential form | Prepare a takedown request |
| C-02 | calder-v0ss.example | Typo-squatting | Escalated | High | Day 2 | WHOIS record, MX record added on day 19, 3 page captures | Report to the registrar |
| C-03 | @calder_voss_group | Digital impersonation | New | High | Day 14 | Profile capture, 5 reused images | Prepare a takedown request |
| C-04 | caldervoss.example | Domain abuse | Unchanged | Medium | Day 1 | WHOIS record, parking page unchanged across 30 runs | Add to watchlist |
| C-05 | calder-voss-shop.example | Counterfeit & unauthorized commercial signals | Resolved | Medium | Day 3 | Listing capture, removal confirmed on day 21 | Add to watchlist |
| C-06 | calder-voss.example (DMARC) | Suspicious digital assets & exposure | Resolved | Low | Day 1 | DNS record set, policy moved to quarantine on day 11 | Add to watchlist |
What is delivered
- Format
- A cycle report across five sections, with an activity summary for the period and retained evidence per change.
- Scope
- The domains, brand terms, executive identities and other assets you confirm at the start of the cycle, re-collected on a schedule.
- Depth
- Changes against known state rather than a fresh list, so you read what moved instead of re-reading what did not.
- Limitations
- Surveillance covers the scope you confirmed and runs for the paid cycle only. It reports what was observable at each collection and states what did not run. It is not a legal determination, and it does not remove anything on your behalf.
Pricing
A sample of the actual deliverable, with synthetic findings. Same structure, same evidence format, same categories as a real assessment.